For Photo Journal entries
Well folks, it took about 4 years to reach the first 100,000 Flickr view, and the second 100,000+ view took a little over 54 weeks!
Guess that is called progress!
Thanks to all those that have visited, commented and linked my images!
[contentblock id=1]
I would like to welcome Kathryn Nevin as Editor to Aseymour.com!
This is a new adventure for the both of us, and I can only hope that it will propagate into something more adventurous!
Kathryn & I meet 30+ years ago at St. Andrew’s School in Middletown DE, and we recently reconnected via Facebook, and after some chatting, we are here.
Kathryn will be working on starting up her Eagle-Eye Editing business and adding her prose to the website, while she helps me clean up after my many grammatical and spelling viruses!
Now I can also offer my clients in the mental health and social justice industries a Professional Editing Services through Seymour Digital Consulting!
Welcome again, Kathryn Nevin!
[contentblock id=1]
Just finished reviewing the Proofs for an up coming article on Downingtown that will be appearing in the April 2014 issue of County Lines Magazine!
In the issue, 5 of my images will be appearing, including a two-page article feature spread!
Needless to say, I am very excited for this type of exposure!
(Sorry!)
I am not sure when issues are mailed to Subscribers, but look for the Annual Wedding Issue!
Thanks again to the wonderful folks at County Lines Magazine for this!
[contentblock id=1]
I was driving along Chamber Lake in Hibernia Park yesterday, and I had to stop for the view of the drawdown with snow.
This is a small (3635×1000) panoramic view, of 9 images ‘stitched’ together, looking toward the dam.
I was standing knee-deep in snow, and for the locals, there is a good 5-8 feet of water missing because of the drawdown.
You can also see maintenance trucks working on the dam itself.
[contentblock id=1]
A little over a year ago, I blogged about my first experience with the photo contest site Pixoto, and during that time, my logs suggest that this was an interesting topic, so I thought I would follow it up.
As mentioned, I have been on Pixoto for over a year now, and I have done essentially the following:
Your mileage many vary…
After a Player/User uploads a file, and submits it to a Category, the fun begins.
Your image is now presented to the world, side by side, with another image, and from there, it is either a “Choose” or not… The ImageDuel™…
Sounds pretty straight forward.
If you start to win, your Image Score goes up and vice versa…
In the background, from what I have read, Pixoto has developed an algorithm that analyses the Rank of each Image, as they are presented, and scored accordingly.
So if a New “Image A” (0-0) [Win-Loss], which goes again “Image B” (5-10), and “A” “Wins”, “Image A” gets more points, than a Win against a (4-10) or less image… Simple.
It’s all about the algorithm…
and over the course of time, the Awards, hopefully, start to appear on your profile!
The Awards are broken up into the following basic groups, based on Time –
Each Time and Percent Level increases your Image Point score, as well as the Category it is entered in.
What this means, is that I can have several different images that are in the Top 5% for the Week, but because they are in different Categories, they will score differently.
In playing Pixoto for a year, it appears to me, that the Landscaping category is the hardest to score in, but can bring big rewards because of its popularity.
It is also very important to choose your Categories correctly.
As with any system, folks are going to look for ways to use that system for their personal benefit.
One of the easiest and most common for a Newbie, is to submit their image into the wrong Category to begin with, and then switch it later.
Thankfully, Pixoto ‘zeros’ out the Image Score when switched, but that does not stop one from submitting several similar images across several categories.
Is this Cheating?
According to Officials at Pixoto, they monitor the ImageDuel™s, and deal with them accordingly.
But with a little effort, it can be easy to find “Top Players” that have numerous ‘similar’ images adding to their high scores.
Example #1 – Similar Images (#15 & #30)
http://www.pixoto.com/images-photography/abstract/all/leading/on-08-01-2013
Which was ruled “Okay”, because the background was changed, i.e. a Photoshop 101 Tutorial change or edit…
Example #2 – Similar Images
http://www.pixoto.com/images-photography/flowers/all/leading/in-all
In several cases, it looks like the Photographer just walked around the object taking pictures. No real difference between the images.
I have also seen cases of several images submitted from a single modeling photo session – no change in clothing, makeup, etc…
Example #3 – Similar Images
Someone who clearly seems to have Mastered basic Photoshop layers…
Additionally, there are countless Threads on the Pixoto Help Forum that strongly suggest that the Points System is Broken or out right cheating.
To be fair, Pixoto does seem to take time to investigate Reports, and seems to have gotten better, but there seems to be a need to improve.
The bottom line, Pixoto’s lack of enforcement hurts the credibility of the site.
Now, I have to be legal, and disclose that I have apparently made money with Pixoto over the last year.
About 8 months ago, Pixoto started an Affiliate Program, and I immediately signed-up, and implemented the code into my website.
I did not see much activity at first, and I did seem to have found an early ‘bug’ at one point (see the Comments section [“Oh S*%#!” error]), but…
Since then, I am happy to report, as of this posting, my “Lifetime earnings” are $12.81 USD, which I have not claimed, yet…
and well over 2500 personal credits…
From a monetary standpoint, I am not quitting my day job any time soon.
As an exercise to see how my images compare to others, this is definitely one of the many that now are available, and I will continue to use it.
It would be kind of cool, if they could connect Google Analytics for the data nerds…
Is this a site for Artistry?
I have seen many beautiful images over the year, and some real junk, but that is to be expected.
My main complaint still being the liberal use of similar images.
What is also different, to me, is the general un-natural feeling to the top images.
One does have to remember that Pixoto allows and encourages the User to sell their images as Stock, which might account for exaggerated vibrancy, saturation and starkness, that can also be found on other, more well-known Stock agencies.
If you shoot a lot of Stock based photography, you will probably do well, but don’t be surprised, when an image, that might have been well received elsewhere (Facebook, Flickr, G+, etc), may not do well at all on Pixoto.