It just so happens, that 5 years ago today, Tropical Storm Nicole, had just passed over the Chester County area, drenching the area, over night, with several inches of rain.
Silly me, I grabbed, my camera, and went out…
Out to Hibernia Park in Coatesville walking along the West Branch of the Brandywine Creek.
Hibernia Park 164
Hibernia Park 315
Hibernia Park 067
Hibernia Park 291
Hibernia Park 014
Hibernia Park 283
Hibernia Park 255
As you can see, there was a great deal of water, especially when you compare these two images, taken 7 months apart, during a Photography Meetup.
Hibernia Park Oct 10 vs Apr 11 – Two images taken 7 months apart in Hibernia County Park, Coatesville, Chester County PA.
Images taken of Malvern for Country Lines Magazine.
I had a chance to work with the good folks over at County Lines Magazine again for their August special Supplement – “Stroll a Royal Mile… Malvern“!
Back in the beginning of June, I got an email from Jo Anne Durako the Editor of the magazine and the writer, Emily Hart about the idea of the supplement, and during the course of the thread, we had an outline for the issue.
On the First day of shooting, I took my two kids with me, as we walked King Street.
It was especially fun for me, because when I first moved down from Boston in 1993, I moved to Malvern, and lived there for a year.
Since then, there have been many changes to the town, and it very much seems to being in a growth mode!
I did a great deal of research be the purchase, and sweated how I was going to pay for much a lens.
Then there was the justification, and knowledge that it will probably not be replaced in the Canon lineup for at least 10 years (in theory, based on the 14 year lifespan of the previous model), and it’s safe to assume that the actual camera/sensor will only get better, and my current camera bodies are on the low-end…
Anyhow, I got it!
Four monthly later, I thought I would add my thoughts into the mix.
Amazon Review
Shortly after receiving the Len, I wrote a Review on Amazon – “Hate It! – Going to Cost me More Money!“, which was not well received, because I was a little too sarcastic…
Guess I was still a little upset after my last attempt to buy something from Canon direct… another story…
But at the same time there are points that are valid, and I will add to them in this post.
As one of the commentators suggested, I was mocking the cost of the lens, which was out of the price range of most buyers.
I agree, this lens, on a pure cost alone, is well beyond most camera owner’s budgets, but as I pointed out, I have owned Canon for nearly 40 years (film and digital); it was part of a ‘mid-life crisis’ purchase and my first L-series lens. I had ‘earned’ it, damn it!
Continuing, I said that I also opening a new insurance rider with this particular lens in mind, which adds to the cost.
At this point, I have six camera bodies and over a dozen different lens, filters, tripods, etc., so I was more than a little surprised when putting an insurance list together, to see how much I have invested over the years, with the 100-400mm being the single biggest line item.
I did NOT take the lens out of the box until I notified my insurance company!
One point to my Amazon Review Subject line contention. (1-0)
The next was filters.
I have several 58mm and 72mm glass filters, but the 100-400mm being 77mm. I needed to buy at least a Circular Polarizer Filter, and again in reading reviews, as some stated, ‘if you are going to spend this much money, are you really going to put cheap glass in front’, plus the lens hood is special designed with this type of filter in mind!
I will also have to upgrade my square 85mm filters to 100mm, but I should have invested in a 100mm system to begin with. My bad.
Another point to my Amazon Review Subject line contention. (2-0)
As I started to review my first images in Adobe Lightroom, using the 100-400mm on my T5i (700D), I did notice ‘things’ did appear to be crisper, and the first image I pulled up, I did say ‘Holy Sh1t!”, but since then, not in all cases.
I’ve shot in direct over-head sun, 1/1000+ at f8+ where it should be sharp, but found some softness, and other times, and I’ve gotten down to 1/30 full open aperture, and razor crisp – all hand-held!
With some of the close-up testing that I’ve done, I am seeing some fraying on some edges, that does not appear to be chromatic aberrations that I am accustomed to seeing.
I am getting the distinct feeling that the sensor (APS-C) is having problems with the resolution detail.
I bought this lens, with the knowledge that it will probably not be replaced in the Canon lineup for at least 10 years (in theory, based on the 14 year lifespan of the previous model), and it’s safe to assume that the actual camera/sensor will only get better, and my current camera bodies are on the low-end…
I will not really see the beauty of this lens without a serious upgrade to a full frame sensor camera body, or put another way, future purchase, future cost.
Point 3 for my Amazon Review Subject hypothesis.
After 4 months of Ownership
Now that I have used the 100-400mm on my T5i (700D) for the past 4 plus months, I wanted to do a follow-up Review, and change the Amazon Review from a 1 Star rating.
Auto-Focus & Ring Placement
In my original commentary on Amazon, I talked about the Auto-Focus (AF) being very fast, but I have also noticed that in fast close-up situations, it can fail very quickly while trying to track/pan with the subject, small insects in my case, carpenter bees.
During the early spring, they fight/protect their nests at high-speed dive bombing attacks, so trying to focus quickly can be difficult at best.
Okay, just switch to manual focus, and focus across on the plane.
No problem, for a shot or two.
For me, the problem is the placement of the Focusing ring, it is the inner most ring, right next to the body.
I have big hands and fingers, so while I am trying to focus, I can not easily steady the lens, the balance is off.
Not that it is going to make any difference, but I would have preferred the Focusing ring closer to the front of the lens to help with stability, with the Zoom ring in the middle and the Zoom touch adjustment ring in the rear.
By the way, I’m not a big fan of the Zoom touch adjustment ring.
Seems like too much real estate on the barrel for too little function, for me.
Lens Envy
I shot event photography, and the range on the 100-400mm is great!
But at the same time, it attracts attention.
I don’t mind, occasionally chatting with folks at an event, but how many times do you really want to hear “That is a big lens!” or “I have Lens Envy”.
This being my first off-white, L-series lens, I guess it might come with the territory…
Conclusions, so far…
The easiest answer is Yes, if you can afford it.
As I have hopefully illustrated, there can be more expenditures beyond the base price, and depending on how you have purchased your older equipment, the amount will be a variable.
My two biggest mistakes up front –
1) I should have had insurance earlier. Thankfully, in 35+ years, I have only ‘killed’ one camera (Canon A-1 (film)) and one Lens (70-300mm f4-5.6). I’ve been VERY lucky!
2) Filters – When I was looking into square filter systems, I thought long and hard about 85mm vs 100mm filter systems, and finally bought a 85mm system, and now I’m kicking myself…
Looking into the future, I can’t wait to pay off this puppy and get a new camera body!
![adobe-PDF-icon[1]](https://i0.wp.com/www.aseymour.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/adobe-PDF-icon1.jpg?resize=76%2C57)
